Missing Heirs and Escheat
An estate cannot close while an heir is unaccounted for. California requires a diligent search, and only where a decedent truly leaves nobody to take — by will or by intestate succession anywhere — does Probate Code section 6800 escheat the property to the state.
Why an estate stalls
A personal representative cannot distribute an estate to the people they happen to know about. Notice has to reach everyone with an interest, and a share belonging to someone unlocated does not simply pass to the others. Estranged siblings, half-siblings from an earlier marriage nobody discussed, children of a predeceased sibling, and relatives abroad are the usual causes — and each of them turns a straightforward administration into one that cannot reach final distribution.
Escheat is the last resort, not the default
Probate Code section 6800 is narrower than its reputation. It applies where a decedent, whether or not domiciled in this state, leaves no one to take the estate or any portion of it by testate succession, and no one other than a government or governmental subdivision or agency to take by intestate succession — under the laws of this state or of any other jurisdiction. Only then does the property escheat, and it does so at the time of the decedent’s death. Property that escheats remains subject to the same charges and trusts to which it would have been subject had it passed by succession, and to the escheated-estates provisions of Code of Civil Procedure title 10. The reason escheat is rare is section 6402, which works outward a long way before running out: to issue, then parents, then the issue of parents, then grandparents or their issue, then the issue of a predeceased spouse, and then to next of kin.
Sources: Probate Code s.6800 - Escheat where no one takes the estate · Probate Code s.6402 - Distribution of the share not passing to a spouse · Verified 2026-08-20.
How far the statute looks before giving up
| Order under §6402 | Who |
|---|---|
| 1 | Issue of the decedent |
| 2 | Parents |
| 3 | Issue of parents — siblings, nieces and nephews |
| 4 | Grandparents, or their issue |
| 5 | Issue of a predeceased spouse |
| 6 | Next of kin in equal degree |
| Last | Escheat under §6800 |
What a diligent search looks like
Courts expect real effort, documented. That means public records, prior addresses, employment and military records, obituaries naming survivors, and enquiries of family members who may know more than they volunteered. Where a search fails, the representative reports what was done rather than simply asserting that nobody could be found — the record of the search is what supports the order the court is asked to make.
Heir-search firms, and reading their contracts
Professional heir finders locate unlocated beneficiaries and approach them with an offer to reveal an inheritance in return for a percentage. Some do genuinely useful work. The contracts vary enormously, and an heir who signs before understanding the share involved can give away a large fraction of a straightforward inheritance for information the estate’s own notice would have delivered free. Anyone approached this way should find out what estate is involved before signing anything.
When a missing heir turns up later
An heir who appears after distribution is not automatically out of luck, but their position is far weaker than it would have been. This is the practical reason representatives should not distribute over a known gap: doing so exposes them personally, and a surcharge claim is the mechanism a late-appearing heir reaches for. Where the omission looks deliberate rather than accidental, it becomes contested probate.
Related: who inherits without a will, closing the estate, the representative’s duties, and being left out deliberately.